The Remaining Descent, by Michael Thompson

Title: The Remaining Descent – The Untold Story of the First Rider to Die within the Tour de France
Creator: Michael Thompson
Writer: Thompson
12 months: 2023
Pages: 213
Order: Thompson
What it’s: A biography of Francisco ‘Paco’ Cepeda, who died whereas collaborating within the 1935 Tour de France
Strengths: Thompson’s dogged analysis has scraped away the layer of fantasy and lies which have grow to be connected to Cepeda’s story, permitting him to get to the reality beneath and supply a becoming tribute to the primary rider to die throughout the Tour as a consequence of a racing accident
Weaknesses: As with loads of biking books, just a few extra footage could be appreciated

fmk

Rising within the north of the Massif des Écrins and fed by the meltwater of the Plate des Agneux glacier, the Romanche river flows down by means of the valley that bears its identify, passing Bourg-d’Oisans and Vizille earlier than emptying into the Drac close to Grenoble, after simply 78 kilometres. Within the early a part of the 20th century the river fed native industries, its water producing electrical energy which powered paper mills and metal works within the villages alongside its size.

Rioupéroux is one such village, about midway between Bourg-d’Oisans and Vizille. Little distinguishes it from different villages within the Romanche valley. However in 1935, towards the top of the seventh stage of the twenty-ninth Tour de France, Rioupéroux’s identify was written into the historical past books. It was there, on Thursday July eleventh, on an innocuous stretch of street on the outskirts of the village, that the Spanish rider Francisco ‘Paco’ Cepeda fell and fractured his cranium. His unconscious physique was rushed to a hospital in Grenoble the place, three days later, he succumbed to his accidents and died. He was the Tour’s first racing fatality, and solely the second rider to die throughout the race, after Adolphe Hélière’s rest-day loss of life in 1910 whereas swimming.

Besides … the historical past books don’t keep in mind Rioupéroux. Cepeda’s loss of life, they virtually all let you know, occurred on the descent off the Galibier. Most preserve it that straightforward, he died descending Henri Desgrange’s favorite mountain. A few of the extra creative add garish color by having Cepeda plunge off the street right into a ravine.

BnF

BnF

Even Rioupéroux itself doesn’t keep in mind its position within the Spaniard’s loss of life: not even a plaque recollects the occasions of that fateful day. Tom Simpson has his altar on the slopes of the Ventoux, Fabio Casartelli his shrine on the Portet d’Aspet, however Cepeda – like Hélière – is with out memorial on the Tour’s route.

Have we grow to be extra mawkish in recent times in the best way that we rejoice the deaths of riders, or is there one thing about Cepeda’s loss of life that makes it troublesome for the Tour and its mythographers to mark correctly?

Michael Thompson’s The Remaining Descent – The Untold Story of the First Rider to Die within the Tour de France doesn’t deal with the primary a part of that query (the reply, in case you might be in any doubt, is sure, we’ve got grow to be extra mawkish) but it surely does go deep into why the second half can be answered within the affirmative.

Cepeda’s loss of life wasn’t merely a racing accident. It was a logo of the informal cruelty with which the Tour handled riders because the race turned increasingly more commercialised. Within the decade since Albert Londres had not referred to the riders of the 1924 Tour as forçats de la route a lot had modified, for the higher. The Tour was exiting the Heroic Age of the vagabonds of the street and gearing up for the Golden Age of stars like Coppi, Koblet, and Bobet. However on the similar time most of the criticisms levelled on the Tour in 1924 have been nonetheless legitimate within the ‘30s. You wouldn’t deal with a mule the best way the Tour handled its riders in these years.

Francisco Cepeda isn’t in contrast to Théo Beeckman, the ostensible topic of Ned Boulting’s current e-book about the 1923 Tour. Like Beeckman’s, his identify seems in all of the blow-by-blow Tour histories however – once more like Beeckman – he doesn’t actually function anyplace. Within the massive image of the Tour, he was one other who was by no means actually all that essential. Which is true of 99% of those that have contributed to the Tour’s historical past. (And the ghost of Homer whispered…)

In contrast to Boulting’s plague diary, which in the end had little to say about Beeckman and favoured as a substitute the creator’s manic, Covid-fed obsessions, Michael Thompson’s The Remaining Descent has loads to inform us about Cepeda and his rise by means of the ranks of the game, in addition to portray a useful portrait of the Tour within the Thirties.

Thompson’s curiosity in Cepeda was first piqued after he and his spouse purchased a small house close to Valloire, the ski resort sandwiched between the Col du Télégraphe and the Col du Galibier. Realizing slightly Tour historical past Thompson knew – or thought he knew – that Cepeda had died descending the Galibier and so, in 2014, he set about discovering out the place.

He additionally set about discovering out extra concerning the man himself, in 2015 visiting the Basque village of Sopuerta the place Cepeda was born in 1906. He devoured books concerning the Tour and, in addition to the French journals out there on Gallica, he trawled Spanish archives, from ABC to Excelsius, La Gaceta del Norte to El Mundo Deportivo.

In 2017 Thompson’s analysis led him to Cepeda’s grand nephew, Alvaro Rey Cepeda, who was additionally looking for solutions to questions on Cepeda. This led to a treasure trove of analysis materials: “The household had saved nearly each Spanish press slicing the place Cepeda’s identify was talked about,” Thompson advised me not too long ago, “and each journal article proper as much as the current day, so I had a wealth of fabric from Spain.”

Taken with the outcomes of his personal analysis, Thompson started to really feel he had sufficient data out there to him to inform Cepeda’s story. His first victories in 1925. His rise by means of the ranks of Basque biking after which the broader realm of Spanish biking. His debut on the worldwide stage when, as a member of the Spanish crew within the 1930 Tour, he was to the fore when the race crossed the Galibier. The frustration of the 1931 Tour. His slide into semi-retirement. His return to racing when he was invited to journey the primary Vuelta a España in 1935. His return to the Tour later that very same 12 months and his loss of life ten days into that race.

BnF

Buried inside all the knowledge out there to him, Thompson rapidly realised, was loads of misinformation. “I got here throughout a number of inaccuracies after I was writing the story,” Thompson advised me. “One was from the Tour de France: Official a hundredth Race Anniversary Version and was fairly dangerous. Beneath the chapter 1935 it reveals an image of Cepeda main Vicente Trueba up the Galibier with a caption saying, ‘Quickly after this picture was taken, Cepeda suffered a deadly crash’. The image is from Cepeda’s debut Tour, in 1930, after they climbed the Galibier from the southern aspect. In 1935, they climbed it from Valloire on the opposite aspect. This e-book was by the famend Tour historian, Serge Laget. Are you able to describe 5 years as being quickly?”

fmk

The errors lengthen past badly captioned photos, as Thompson defined to me: “In among the historical past books I’ve learn the household is described as bourgeois and rich. They are saying Cepeda didn’t have to journey for the cash. That’s not true both. He actually didn’t go into biking for the cash however when he did begin to earn cash it actually helped the household. All of them labored onerous. With the cash he earned from biking Cepeda rented a automobile for the household however then labored as a taxi driver to assist pay for the operating of it. The household ran a really small normal retailer from their home within the village however there have been many mouths to feed.”

The concept Cepeda was bourgeois, that comes from the pages of L’Auto, the place the playwright Robert Dieudonné, eulogising Cepeda, described him in these phrases:

“Poor little Cepeda! He was not, like Trueba, slightly peasant who hoped to make his fortune on the roads of France. He was the son of a bourgeois household: his father is on the head of a enterprise the place his son was employed. I can see the daddy shrugging his shoulders when the son left to compete but once more within the Tour de France: ‘As if you happen to wanted it!’”

Whether or not it was his intent or not, in putting Cepeda as a member of the bourgeoisie, Dieudonné was suggesting that Cepeda was not a correct, skilled bicycle owner, only a dilettante. Whether or not it was his intent or not, Dieudonné was saying Cepeda was complicit in his personal loss of life, a devoted skilled wouldn’t have fallen the best way Cepeda did.

Few right now blame Cepeda for what occurred to him, it typically being agreed right now that Cepeda’s accident was brought on by the Duralumin – a light-weight aluminium-copper alloy – rims Tour bikes got here geared up with in 1935, changing the wood rims favoured as much as then. All through the early a part of the 1935 Tour, some journalists had been blaming the steel rims for what they felt was an extreme variety of punctures and crashes, the argument being that steel rims carried out warmth badly and this prompted the glue binding the tyres to them to soften and the tubulars to then roll off.

“I’ve had the expertise of a tubular rolling off the rear rim in a street race again within the late 70,” Thompson advised me. “I’d punctured warming up and didn’t have a spare wheel so I put a brand new tub on for the race. A lot of the adhesive comes off with the punctured tyre once you rip it off and the brand new tyre is simply caught on with what’s left on the rim. Forty miles into the race on a nook it rolled off. It was the again wheel so I fortunately simply went right into a slide and acquired the standard street rash.

“In 1935 they have been puncturing a number of occasions so I’m unsure how a lot adhesive could be left on the edges or how good the adhesive was within the first place. I’ve additionally ridden from the Galibier all the best way to Grenoble and there’s a lot of braking and the route they took down the south aspect was loads steeper than the current route.

“The part of street the place Cepeda crashed isn’t that steep and the bend is extra of a gradual curve so I feel it’s unlikely that the autumn may be put solely all the way down to an unlucky error of judgement by the rider however the absolute fact won’t ever be identified.”

BnF

Thompson doesn’t go into the story of the Duralumin rims in any nice element. “Within the e-book I write about what I do know to be true and keep away from something which I’ve doubts about or don’t have any proof for,” he defined to me, and with regards to the Duralumin rims, a lot is unknown. That stated, I personally would have most popular a bit extra on this facet of the story. Incidents like Annemiek van Vleuten’s crash within the 2022 World Championships or Thomas de Gendt’s within the 2024 UAE Tour have demonstrated we may be fairly crap at correctly figuring out the reason for some crashes. We shouldn’t simply settle for unquestioningly the claims made concerning the position of the Duralumin rims in Cepeda’s fall.

BnF

The reason for Cepeda’s fall is essential, but it surely isn’t the true situation right here. The true situation right here is how Desgrange and L’Auto responded to Cepeda’s loss of life. And that is a matter Thompson does go into element on.

The quick model of how Desgrange and L’Auto responded to Cepeda’s loss of life is that they responded badly. Cepeda’s fall on the Aix-les-Bains — Grenoble stage went unreported in L’Auto and when information of his loss of life got here by means of three days later the race have moved on to Good, sarcastically the place Hélière had died 25 years earlier. As they did then, and as they’ve finished since, the riders paused a second in silence to recollect their fallen comrade. After which acquired on with issues.

However they weren’t all getting on with issues on Duralumin rims. A report in Le Miroir des Sports activities claimed that even earlier than Cepeda’s accident Desgrange had accepted there was a problem with the edges and referred to as in alternative wheels, with tried-and-tested wood rims. “The truth that Desgrange switched the Duralumin rims for wood rims,” Thompson advised me, “demonstrated that he had doubts about them. However he stopped in need of a full and correct investigation, which I feel amounted to negligence. You wouldn’t get away with that now.”

Throughout the pages of L’Auto, little was written about Cepeda past Dieudonné’s saccharine eulogy. Communist and socialist newspapers took up Cepeda’s trigger and criticised Desgrange and the Tour, however in contrast to in 1924 when L’Auto had addressed criticisms of the race being made by Albert Londres and Henri Pélissier, this time around the critics have been met with silence.

“It appeared that Henri Desgrange went out of his manner to not acknowledge Paco’s loss of life,” Thompson writes in The Remaining Descent. “He was presumably determined to keep away from any unfavourable protection of his race, in addition to accusations of blame. […] Primitivo, Paco’s youthful brother, was offended concerning the absence of any monetary compensation from the Tour and the truth that Desgrange didn’t attend the funeral or supply his private condolences. He confirmed that the household had written to the Tour asking for the insurance coverage protection however, in return, had solely obtained a duplicate of a clause, by which the organisers acknowledged they weren’t accountable for any accidents obtained by the riders, and, moreover, wouldn’t even be accountable for any damages prompted to 3rd events.”

BnF

Having washed their palms of the issue in 1935, the Tour has continued to have a problematic relationship with Cepeda. Writing in his 1991 memoir L’Équipe Belle Jacques Goddet – Desgrange’s successor, who was on the 1935 Tour – didn’t even point out Cepeda’s loss of life when he wrote concerning the 1935 race, preferring as a substitute to recount an anecdote about Georges Speicher practically getting arrested. Within the Tour’s official historical past, even the suggestion that the Duralumin rims may need performed a task in Cepeda’s loss of life is ignored, Laget and his colleagues as a substitute claiming that “Cepeda suffered a deadly fall on the descent of the Galibier because of brake failure.”

Cepeda deserves higher than this. His is a crucial story, one as related now because it was then for the best way it reveals how little we query the hazards in our sport and the way used we’re to simply sweeping accidents away and getting on with it. The followers. The media. The authorities. It doesn’t should be like that.

However The Remaining Descent is about extra than simply that. Additionally it is a couple of man, an actual particular person, a man who shone brightly briefly however whose life and whose loss of life have largely been neglected, grow to be shrouded in lies and half-truths. Cepeda could also be with out memorial on the street the place he fell however Thompson right here has given him a becoming tribute, one price your time studying.

fmk