Wednesday, January 15, 2025
HomeBitcoinsafety - A theoretical low value assault situation in PoW currencies

safety – A theoretical low value assault situation in PoW currencies


The situation was designed by consumer:croraf and me in discussing a query of mine yesterday. To make it extra clear, I wish to current it right here once more in a stricter design.

To do it in a transparent approach, first 4 assumptions:

  1. Transactions are accepted when N blocks verify them.
  2. We will make contact to the vast majority of the miners, they’re egoistic and barely invested within the PoW forex.
  3. An assault with the vast majority of mining energy is feasible. To make it extra clear: We assume that rewriting blockchain historical past with undoing many transactions is so stunning, that we will get our advantages from the assault earlier than the forex goes down.
  4. There may be an alt coin, resistant in opposition to our following assault situation, with out worth correlation to PoW currencies. Mining {hardware} permits to mine the alt coin in addition to the PoW forex.

Now the assault situation.

We do a transaction with a better worth than mining advantages from N blocks. We wait till N blocks verify our transaction, so the transaction is accepted by assumption 1. Than we bribe the vast majority of miners to create a fork to make our transaction undone. The bribe have to be solely a bit bit greater than the mining advantages on the “actual” chain as a result of they’re egoistic and aren’t taken with maintain the forex alive by assumption 2. Solely paying the bribe the price of the assault could be very low relative to the promised win! The miners and we get our advantages from the assault earlier than the forex is down by assumption 3. Then the PoW forex perhaps goes down, however the bribed miners can go to mine the alt coin with none loss, what is feasible by assumation 4.

The place is the fault, within the assault situation or within the assumptions?

I feel the assault situation is right and the recommended faults within the assumptions from the dialogue yesterday cannot persuade my.

Crucial critics I already know:

Assumption 1: We must always solely belief transactions with values comparable with mining prices, however this makes the forex inefficient, which was confirmed right here.

Assumption 3: Should you do not belief this assumption, so that you deny regular assault situation of PoW forex. Should you achieve this, why should not we do PoW with a really low problem and a really small mining energy then?

EDIT: I feel we will skip assumption 3 by doing the assault with a brief place which implies we do the excessive worth transaction at first with cryptos we’ve lended. I appears clear that the forex goes down after such an enormous assault and so we even revenue from the quick.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments