The 2024 NBA Draft feels just like the weakest class to enter the league in a decade. You need to return to 2013 for the final time a draft had such a definite lack of starpower on the high, however that class additionally provides provides some invaluable classes for this one. Anthony Bennett was a surprising No. 1 general decide to the Cleveland Cavaliers again then, and he changed into a monumental bust. On the identical time, there have been nonetheless two future Corridor of Famers lurking after the lottery (Giannis Antetokounmpo and Rudy Gobert) and loads of stable execs scattered all through.
Even unhealthy drafts have good gamers, and this one will, too. It’s simply going to be extraordinarily troublesome to determine the eventual finest participant within the class with the No. 1 general decide, as a result of nobody can agree on who that participant is that this yr. Earlier than we delve into our remaining rankings, listed below are a couple of notes about my draft philosophy as somebody who has been on the beat since about 2013.
I put essentially the most worth into how good a participant will be in his prime years. I don’t actually care if I’m flawed, as a result of in contrast to NBA GMs, I face no penalties for it. For that purpose, I are inclined to desire gamers with larger ceilings than extra sure flooring. I sometimes go for gamers with elite bodily instruments, as a result of it provides them extra outs for fulfillment … however I’ve a behavior of falling for super-skilled smaller guards, too. I put extra worth into shot creation than every other talent. I attempt to give the good thing about the doubt to gamers with a powerful really feel for the sport. I worth off-ball defensive impression enormously. I all the time take a look at superior metrics like BPM and luxuriate in testing totally different draft fashions, however sometimes rely extra by myself eye take a look at and intestine test.
I launched my first huge board for this class the day after the 2023 draft. A lot has modified since then. Listed here are our remaining top-60 participant rating for the 2024 NBA Draft.
2024 NBA Draft board
Rank | Tier | Participant | From | Place | Age |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | Tier | Participant | From | Place | Age |
1 | 1 | Nikola Subject | Serbia | G | Born 2005 |
2 | 1 | Alex Sarr | France | C/F | Born 2005 |
3 | 1 | Ron Holland | G League Ignite | F | Born 2005 |
4 | 2 | Reed Sheppard | Kentucky | G | Freshman |
5 | 2 | Rob Dillingham | Kentucky | G | Freshman |
6 | 2 | Matas Buzelis | G League Ignite | F | Born 2004 |
7 | 2 | Isaiah Collier | USC | G | Freshman |
8 | 2 | Donovan Clingan | UConn | C | Sophomore |
9 | 2 | Devin Carter | Windfall | G | Junior |
10 | 2 | Zaccharie Risacher | France | F | Born 2005 |
11 | 2 | Stephon Fortress | UConn | G | Freshman |
12 | 3 | Tyler Smith | G League Ignite | F | Born 2004 |
13 | 3 | Kel’el Ware | Indiana | C | Sophomore |
14 | 3 | Cody Williams | Colorado | F | Freshman |
15 | 3 | Tidjane Salaun | France | F | Born 2005 |
16 | 3 | Kyle Filipowski | Duke | C | Sophomore |
17 | 3 | Yves Missi | Baylor | C | Freshman |
18 | 3 | Dalton Knecht | Tennessee | F | Senior |
19 | 3 | Zach Edey | Purdue | C | Senior |
20 | 3 | Jared McCain | Duke | G | Freshman |
21 | 3 | DaRon Holmes II | Dayton | F/C | Junior |
22 | 3 | Ja’Kobe Walter | Baylor | F | Freshman |
23 | 3 | Jaylon Tyson | Cal | G | Junior |
24 | 3 | Bub Carrington | Pitt | G | Freshman |
25 | 4 | Tristan da Silva | Colorado | F | Senior |
26 | 4 | Pacome Dadiet | France | F | Born 2005 |
27 | 4 | Kevin McCullar | Kansas | G/F | Senior |
28 | 4 | KJ Simpson | Colorado | G | Junior |
29 | 4 | Johnny Furphy | Kansas | F | Freshman |
30 | 4 | Ryan Dunn | Virginia | F | Sophomore |
31 | 4 | Terrence Shannon Jr. | Illinois | G/F | Senior |
32 | 4 | Jamal Shead | Houston | G | Senior |
33 | 4 | Adem Bona | UCLA | C | Sophomore |
34 | 4 | Ajay Mitchell | UC Santa Barbara | G | Junior |
35 | 5 | Tyler Kolek | Marquette | G | Senior |
36 | 5 | Kyshawn George | Miami | F | Freshman |
37 | 5 | N’Faly Dante | Oregon | C | Senior |
38 | 5 | Bobi Klintman | Sweden | F | Born 2003 |
39 | 5 | Judah Mintz | Syracuse | G | Sophomore |
40 | 5 | Juan Nunez | Spain | G | Born 2004 |
41 | 5 | Keshad Johnson | Arizona | F | Senior |
42 | 5 | Dillon Jones | Weber State | G | Junior |
43 | 5 | Melvin Ajinca | France | G | Born 2004 |
44 | 5 | Jaylen Wells | Washington State | F | Junior |
45 | 5 | Nikola Djurisic | Serbia | F | Born 2004 |
46 | 5 | Isaiah Crawford | Louisiana Tech | F | Senior |
47 | 5 | Jonathan Mogbo | San Francisco | F | Senior |
48 | 5 | Cam Christie | Minnesota | G | Freshman |
49 | 5 | Harrison Ingram | North Carolina | F | Junior |
50 | 5 | Baylor Scheierman | Creighton | F | Senior |
51 | 5 | Ulrich Chomche | Cameroon | C/F | Born 2005 |
52 | 6 | Oso Ighodaro | Marquette | C | Senior |
53 | 6 | Anton Watson | Gonzaga | C/F | Senior |
54 | 6 | Tristen Newton | UConn | G | Senior |
55 | 6 | Reece Beekman | Virginia | G | Senior |
56 | 6 | Bronny James | USC | G | Freshman |
57 | 6 | Antonio Reeves | Kentucky | G | Senior |
58 | 6 | Justin Edwards | Kentucky | F | Freshman |
59 | 6 | AJ Johnson | Illawarra Hawks | G | Born 2005 |
60 | 6 | Jalen Bridges | Baylor | F | Senior |
Tier 1: All-Star upside if issues break proper
1. Nikola Subject, G, Crimson Stars (Serbia)
Subject first emerged as the highest participant in our board in Dec. throughout a torrid begin to the season for Mega within the Adriatic League. Since then, he modified groups and suffered two knee accidents, the newest of which resulted in a torn ACL. That is the least assured I’ve ever felt about rating a participant No. 1 general in a draft class, however in the end Subject’s polish at a particularly younger age (he turns 19 years in August) and upside as a possible on-ball engine received out.
The principle enchantment for Subject is his shot creation potential, his positional measurement as a 6’6 level guard, and his simple manufacturing going towards grown males. Subject is a downhill attacking guard who can burn defenders off the dribble together with his super burst going to the basket. Whereas he lacks vertical explosion (he completed with zero dunks this season), he’s a particularly artful finisher who used lengthy strides and extension finishes to transform his rim alternatives effectively all season. He’s at his finest working out of the pick-and-roll, the place he can leverage the specter of his personal scoring to open up passing lanes to teammates.
In 13 video games with Mega, Subject averaged 18.6 factors, 6.9 assists, 3.7 rebounds per sport on terrific 62.9 % true capturing. He acquired to the foul line so much (and made 87.8 % of his free throws), posted a powerful assist-to-turnover ratio, and completed with an “wonderful” grade on pick-and-roll ball dealing with, isolations, and transition alternatives, in line with Synergy Sports activities.
There’s nonetheless appreciable draw back right here. Subject shouldn’t be three-point shooter in the mean time, and can face groups going underneath each display screen early in his profession. He tends to float a bit when he doesn’t have the ball within the halfcourt. He reveals poor method and effectiveness defensively. It’s honest to marvel how a participant so reliant on his burst will look coming off a torn ACL.
Nonetheless, Subject put up incredible numbers as an 18-year-old in a stable professional league, and has a uncommon skill to generate simple baskets together with his pace as a ball handler. His mixture of scoring and playmaking as a downhill guard feels just like the clearest pathway on this class to All-Star potential if all the pieces breaks proper.
2. Alex Sarr, C/F, Perth Wildcats (France)
Sarr has one of the best bodily instruments on this class as an athletic 7’1 huge man with a 7’4 wingspan. He has the potential for elite defensive versatility as a giant man who can defend the rim from the backline, or change screens and persist with smaller perimeter gamers. Sarr can fly within the open ground, or soar above the rim to complete performs on either side of the ball. Whereas his offense stays a piece in progress, he’s proven some tantalizing flashes as a ball handler and shooter. Sarr will be irritating to observe at occasions as a result of he doesn’t play with a lot drive offensively, he’s not a plus passer, and he tends to surrender alternatives on the glass. Will he shoot it effectively sufficient long-term to be an NBA 4? Will he rebound it effectively sufficient to play heart? The offensive upside right here comes if Sarr’s three-point shot develops, or his physique blows up and he’s capable of begin working over guys. Even with questions on his offensive function, Sarr’s floor protection and explosion is a uncommon mixture at 7’1 and provides him actual star fairness long-term as a play finisher.
3. Ron Holland, F, G League Ignite
Learn my profile on Holland right here. I’m betting on Holland’s skill to make profitable performs when he’s not overmatched in a major creation function like he was for the Ignite. His athleticism, slashing, defensive motor, passing contact, and transition scoring ought to all translate effectively to the league. He’ll clearly have to enhance his bounce shot, and I want he was just a little larger to play the 4. Whereas his G League numbers had been underwhelming, the truth that he was capable of study what it’s like to hold such an enormous utilization charge at a younger age needs to be helpful for his long-term growth. Nonetheless solely 18 years outdated on draft day, Holland is without doubt one of the few gamers on this class to have star upside together with his bodily instruments, pedigree, and hustle.
Tier 2: Potential high-end complementary gamers
4. Reed Sheppard, G, Kentucky: Sheppard is tiny and doesn’t supply a ton of on-ball creation upside, however he’s such shooter and has a particular skill to drive turnovers defensively. He’d be at this finest filling within the cracks for a crew with size and athleticism round him, permitting him to faucet into his shot versatility and maximize spacing. Sheppard will get bodily overpowered defensively in sure matchups, however he has unimaginable palms to generate turnovers and is great kickstarting the break with outlet passes. He’s going to be under the scale and athleticism thresholds for many NBA guards, but when he can proceed the elite three-point stroke he confirmed at Kentucky (52.1 % from deep on 144 makes an attempt), he ought to deliver sufficient to the desk to be an elite complementary piece.
5. Rob Dillingham, G, Kentucky: Dillingham is dangerously small at 6’1 barefoot with a 6’3 wingspan, and would be the lightest participant within the NBA subsequent season after weighing in at 164 kilos on the mix. You want to be enormously expert to thrive within the NBA at that measurement, and I imagine Dillingham meets the factors. The Kentucky freshman is without doubt one of the nice shooters on this draft class, capable of rip deep pull-ups off the dribble or relocate off-the-ball for backbreaking catch-and-shoot threes. He hit 44.4 % of his 144 makes an attempt this season, and knocked them down on each motion doable. Dillingham additionally has a case as one of the best ball handler on this class, capable of hyperlink collectively strikes to maintain his defender off stability whereas attacking. He has superior imaginative and prescient as a passer, and appears comfy throwing all the pieces from lobs to skips to pocket passes to the roll man. His lack of ability to play via any contact is a giant concern, however the shot-making and playmaking right here is simply too thrilling to low cost.
6. Matas Buzelis, F, G League Ignite: Buzelis is just going to must shoot it higher from three than he did with the G League Ignite (26.1 % from three on 115 makes an attempt in 34 video games) to achieve success within the NBA, however monitor document as a shooter at decrease ranges evokes some confidence that might occur. Having a dependable spot-up jumper would unlock the remainder of Buzelis’ offensive sport. It’s uncommon to search out forwards this huge (6’8.75 with a 6’10 wingspan) who can assault off the bounce with creativity and make performs for themselves and others. Buzelis additionally confirmed a stunning quantity of defensive toughness on the rim (64 blocks in 34 video games) regardless of a thin body. This rating may look unhealthy if the shot doesn’t come round, however the preferrred model of Buzelis is sort of well-rounded ahead each crew covets.
7. Isaiah Collier, G, USC: Collier entered the cycle as a possible top-3 decide, however rapidly misplaced momentum throughout a gradual begin for USC. There was much less consideration on his scorching near the season, but it surely deserves the identical consideration. Collier is just among the best shot-creation bets on this class as a powerful and quick downhill guard with the requisite passing imaginative and prescient. At 6’2.5 barefoot, Collier has a burly 205-pound body which he makes use of to place constant stress on the rim. He completed effectively on the rim (61.7 %) with almost 74 % of these seems being self-created (with out an help). He acquired himself in bother with turnovers for a lot of the season, partially as a result of his passes too formidable, partially as a result of USC didn’t have the spacing or lob threats to maximise his imaginative and prescient. Collier’s largest swing talent is unquestionably his bounce shot: he made 33.8 % of his 80 makes an attempt on the yr. For a participant who will get to the road a ton, he ought to in all probability begin engaged on his free throws, too, as a result of he solely hit 67 % from the charity stripe. If Collier can develop any form of shot — even from mid-range — his speedy, bully ball sport may nonetheless have severe professional upside.
8. Donovan Clingan, C, UConn: It’s exhausting to know simply how large Clingan is. At 7’1.75 barefoot with a 7’6.75 wingspan and 280 pound body, he would have been one of many NBA’s tallest, longest, and heaviest gamers final season. Clingan was the rock on back-to-back nationwide championship groups at UConn, and his sport has a simple translation to the NBA as a rim protector. Whereas he’ll largely must play drop protection, his size and shot-blocking instincts give him an opportunity to be one of many league’s high paint deterrents. The offense may very well be a bit worrisome to me, regardless of the spectacular playmaking chops and glowing 63.7 true capturing proportion he posted this yr. Clingan simply doesn’t get a lot pop off the bottom as a leaper, and his finishes will get a lot more durable towards extra athletic NBA defenders. I additionally discover it regarding that Clingan performed lower than half the out there minutes for UConn on the season, and solely performed over half-hour 4 occasions in his sophomore yr. Clingan feels safer than different prospects for his measurement and simple function translation, however his scoring and conditioning points give me some pause with a high decide.
9. Devin Carter, G, Windfall: Carter took a celebrity leap in his junior season at Windfall by including improved three-point capturing and paint ending to his already tenacious defensive skill. Carter Carter went from hitting 29.9 % of his threes as a sophomore to 37.7 this previous season whereas almost doubling his variety of makes an attempt. He confidently stepped into pull-ups when the protection went underneath screens, and rapidly relocated for spot-ups when he was off-the-ball. Carter’s improved stroke opened up the remainder of his offense, and his added craft as a driver (he famous he began taking part in off two-feet extra to mannequin his sport after Jalen Brunson after a suggestion from the teaching employees) helped him end a powerful 65 % of his pictures on the rim. Carter’s finest attribute is his protection. Carter has size (6’8.75 wingspan) and explosive leaping skill (42-inch max vertical) that helps him play a lot larger than his measurement. His 26 dunks this season are a surprising quantity for a guard who measured 6’2 barefoot. The catch with Carter is he’ll flip 23 years outdated throughout his rookie season, and is already the identical age as somebody like Jalen Inexperienced who has three NBA seasons already underneath his belt. Nonetheless, Carter’s incredible protection and improved capturing stroke earmarks him as a disruptive guard who would thrive subsequent to a much bigger initiator.
10. Zaccharie Risacher, F, JL Bourg (France): Risacher simply doesn’t have sufficient shot creation upside to go larger than this to me, but it surely does really feel like he has a excessive ground as an off-ball wing who can house the ground. At 6’8.5 barefoot with a 6’9.5 wingspan, Risacher performed a giant function within the high French professional league, and had a few of his finest video games of the yr deep within the playoffs. He hit 38.7 % of his threes on 238 makes an attempt this season, normally getting up three or 4 makes an attempt per sport. Along with the capturing, Risacher seems like defensive ahead, but it surely appears like he defends guards higher than wings. Is he able to defending somebody like Jayson Tatum a couple of years from now in a playoff sequence? If not, it’s exhausting to see why he’s within the combine for No. 1 general on condition that he’s not somebody you ask to take the ball and create offense.
11. Stephon Fortress, G, UConn: Overlook the noise about Fortress viewing himself as a long-term level guard: proper now, he’s completely suited as a defensive stopper who’s extra of a connective wing offensively. At 6’5.5 barefoot with a 6’9 wingspan and powerful 210-pound body, Fortress is a bodily guard who wins unfastened balls and rebounds and may play via contact on each ends. His three-point shot is simply very unhealthy proper now (26.7 % on 75 makes an attempt), so a crew must get inventive find out how to use him offensively (as a short-roll playmaker, within the dunker’s spot, and so on.) early in his profession. Fortress’s measurement and physicality stands out even with a damaged jumper, and if he ever fixes it, this may very well be one of many higher gamers on this class.
Tier 3: Gamers with a pathway to success, however with extra threat
12. Tyler Smith, F, G League Ignite: Smith was nearly the one participant on the Ignite who surpassed expectations this yr. A 6’9 ahead with a 7’1 wingspan, Smith is a traditional stretch 4 whose largest worth will come from his capturing and spacing. He hit 36 % of his threes on 161 makes an attempt for the yr. Smith additionally will get off the ground fairly rapidly for a giant man, and had 58 dunks as a strong inside finisher. His ball dealing with is simply too restricted to create off the dribble, and his protection is an journey at this level. He’ll must shoot it at a excessive stage to return such a a worth, however he’s value an opportunity as a tall, athletic marksman with deep vary.
13. Kel’el Ware, C, Indiana: Ware is oozing with expertise, and it’s one thing of a present and a curse for him. At 6’11.75 barefoot with a 7’4.5 wingspan, Ware is a large heart with tantalizing athleticism and a pleasant capturing stroke. He has a simple translation as a rim curler who can slam dwelling dunks on offense (he had 63 dunks this season) and block pictures in drop protection defensively. The upside right here comes if Ware’s shot continues to develop after he hit 42 % of his threes on low quantity (40 makes an attempt in 30 video games) this yr. So what’s the catch? Ware is so gifted that he typically leaves you wanting extra. He’s lengthy been a participant stated to have a low motor courting again to his freshman yr Oregon, and there are occasions on tape when it appears like he may have grabbed a rebound or blocked a shot however didn’t. He’s not a plus passer, and isn’t somebody who needs to be tasked with decision-making on offense. Ware’s mixture of bodily instruments and capturing potential remains to be so uncommon that groups are going to be kicking themselves for passing on him if all of it comes collectively.
16. Kyle Filipowski, C, Duke: Filipowski isn’t the largest or most explosive heart, however he has a case as essentially the most expert huge within the class offensively. The Duke sophomore is a pick-and-pop menace who also can act as a passing hub within the halfcourt. He made 34.8 % of his threes on 112 makes an attempt this season, and completed with a powerful 18.4 % help charge. His protection is probably going going to be an issue as a result of he’s not very lengthy (6’10.50’ wingspan) and he can’t actually bounce, however his playmaking and shot-making is efficacious in a league all the time on the lookout for stretch bigs.
18. Dalton Knecht, F, Tennessee: Knecht is one of the best story within the draft, rising as a possible lottery decide after a winding journey that included two seasons of JUCO ball and two years at Northern Colorado earlier than his celebrity flip at Tennessee this previous season. He has a simple translation to the NBA as an off-ball shooter and scorer who can stroke it from deep and assault the rim with some athleticism. I’m decrease on Knecht as a result of I’m extremely skeptical of his protection, and may’t recover from the truth that he turns 24 years outdated on the finish of his rookie yr. Nonetheless, a crew that wants a wing with actual capturing versatility and sufficient juice to complete above the rim when he will get a transparent lane will in all probability take him a lot larger than this.
19. Zach Edey, C, Purdue: Learn my huge breakdown of Edey’s professional potential right here. His unprecedented measurement, scoring contact, offensive rebounding, and motor provides him a sliver of star upside at this level within the draft. I simply don’t understand how he defends an opposing huge who can shoot, or a speedy guard on a spaced ground. I’d have him larger if I felt higher about him as a processor and passer.
Tier 4 bets
21. DaRon Holmes II, C/F, Dayton: Holmes was one of many highest gamers in school basketball as a junior for Dayton, unleashing a brand new dimension of his sport by including offensive abilities on the perimeter. Holmes has all the time a powerful roll man, dunker’s spot finisher, and rim protector with the Flyers. This previous season, he improved as a shooter (38.6 % from three on 83 makes an attempt), ball handler, and passer. Groups will marvel if Holmes is sufficiently big to play the 5 within the NBA (he measured 6’8.75 barefoot with a 7’1 wingspan) or expert sufficient to play the 4. That may be overthinking it. He’s only a actually good participant with legit measurement who can discover a option to make an impression no matter his function.
25. Bub Carrington, G, Pittsburgh: Carington is a tall (6’3.75 barefoot with a 6’8 wingspan), extraordinarily younger (turns 19 a month after the draft) guard with an innate skill to take and make pull-up jumpers. He wasn’t all the time an environment friendly scorer (53 % true capturing), however Carrington’s skill to create his personal shot and money troublesome pull-ups is trait that defines star guards. It would take a while, however Carrington’s upside is value betting on in a weak class.
26. Pacome Dadiet, F, Ulm (France): Dadiet is a brilliant younger French younger (turns 19 in late July) with an intriguing mixture of positional measurement, athleticism, and capturing contact. Measuring at 6’7.5 barefoot with a 6’9 wingspan, Dadiet hit 39 % of his threes, a excessive proportion of two-pointers, and confirmed motor to get rebounds and steals. It would take a couple of years earlier than he’s prepared for the NBA, however the instruments are there.
4 NBA Draft sleepers value focusing on
28. KJ Simpson, G, Colorado: Simpson was among the best guards in school basketball by any measure as a junior for Colorado. He’s a fast and dynamic lead ball handler who can blow previous his defender off the dribble, hit a troublesome floater or mid-range pull-up, or generate free throw makes an attempt on the rim. Better of all, Simpson is a high-volume three-point sniper, hitting 43 % of 181 makes an attempt on the season. Simpson performs larger than his measurement and posted spectacular defensive rebound charges and steal charges this season. It’s exhausting to make it within the league as a guard who measured 6’0.25 barefoot, however Simpson is expert sufficient to have an opportunity.
32. Jamal Shead, G, Houston: Shead an absolute menace defensively. The Houston senior persistently makes a number of efforts on possessions to recover from screens, break up passing lanes, and press up on opposing ball handlers with tight, bodily protection. His 4.3 % steal charge and a couple of % block charge this season are spectacular numbers for a guard who measured 6-foot with out sneakers. Shead additionally took on the largest offensive load of his profession this season, and answered the problem by turning into a incredible school distributor and succesful quantity scorer. His bounce shot and his measurement are main questions, however Shead’s motor and IQ are too spectacular to wager towards.
33. Adem Bona, C, UCLA: Bona is an explosive athlete with size who makes performs above the rim on each ends of the ground. The UCLA sophomore was a monster finisher on the rim this yr (76 %) by working the ground exhausting and getting off the bottom rapidly as a leaper. He posted the best standing vertical leap on the mix (35 inches), and was among the many high performers in max vertical (40 inches), too. Placing up these numbers at 243 kilos with a 7’3.5 wingspan is undeniably spectacular. Bona is unquestionably quick for an NBA heart (6’8.5 barefoot) and he doesn’t have any perimeter talent offensively, however his size, power, hustle, and elite leaping are value consideration as an power huge off the bench.
37. N’Faly Dante, C, Oregon: Dante has the scale and power to suit on an NBA courtroom as a play finisher proper now. He measured at 6’ 10 barefoot with a 7’6 wingspan at 260 kilos. He made 69.5 % of his area objectives solely hammering dwelling inside feeds created by his teammates. He has to play a comparatively slender function and can flip 23 years outdated at first of the season, Dante’s instruments, contact, and manufacturing shouldn’t be discounted.