Monday, October 28, 2024
HomeCryptocurrencyMy Recommendations for MAS's Proposed DTSPs Framework

My Recommendations for MAS’s Proposed DTSPs Framework


Singapore has persistently positioned itself as a
forward-thinking jurisdiction, balancing innovation with strong regulatory
oversight. As a fellow Singaporean, I’m very happy with its future planning.

The Financial Authority of Singapore (MAS) is looking for submissions for the Session Paper on the proposed regulatory method for
Digital Token Service Suppliers (DTSPs) below the Monetary Companies and
Markets Act 2022.

As an alternative of replying to the submission immediately, I’ll
attempt to share my standpoint overtly right here, providing insights, potential plans,
and timelines for implementation. Earlier than I begin, I’m sharing this in my
private capability: I don’t signify any self-claimed digital belongings professional
teams, associations, or colleges.

License Software and Payment
Buildings

Within the first half of 2024, Singapore’s fintech market
noticed its cryptocurrency and blockchain sectors obtain US$211.90 million throughout
72 offers, marking a 22% enhance from US$166.30 million over 38 offers in
the second half of 2023.

Singapore has been actively engaged on strengthening
danger administration frameworks for digital asset tokenization and has lately
launched an initiative to increase asset tokenization inside monetary providers.

The proposed license utility processes and payment
constructions are essential components that may form the DTSP panorama in
Singapore. From my perspective, MAS ought to take into account implementing a tiered
method to each timelines and costs, reflecting the variety of DTSPs in phrases
of measurement, complexity, and danger profile.

For timelines, I suggest a three-tier system:

Quick-track
(60 days)
: For small, low-risk DTSPs with simple enterprise fashions.

Normal
(90 days)
: For medium-sized DTSPs or these with reasonably complicated operations.

Prolonged
(120+ days)
: For big, complicated DTSPs or these proposing novel enterprise fashions.

This tiered method would enable MAS to allocate
assets effectively whereas making certain thorough vetting of extra complicated
purposes. The payment constructions can comply with an analogous tiered system based mostly on
the DTSP’s annual income or transaction quantity could possibly be carried out.

Minimal Monetary Necessities

The proposed minimal monetary necessities are a
important safeguard in opposition to potential market disruptions and client losses.
Based mostly on my evaluation, I consider a risk-based method to setting these
necessities is extra possible. This might contain:

Base
Capital Requirement
: A minimal base capital for all DTSPs, no matter measurement
or providers provided.

Danger-Weighted
Capital Requirement
: Extra capital necessities based mostly on the DTSP’s kinds of providers provided, transaction volumes, and danger profile.

Liquidity
Requirement
: A minimal liquidity ratio to make sure DTSPs can meet short-term
obligations.

Particularly, suppliers with capital
ratios above 15% have been 30% much less prone to face operational disruptions throughout
intervals of utmost market stress. I suggest that MAS take into account setting the bottom
capital requirement at SGD 250,000, with further risk-weighted necessities
that would enhance this quantity as much as SGD 5 million for the most important and most
complicated DTSPs.

Audit
Necessities

The proposed duties of CEOs, administrators, and companions,
together with audit necessities, are elementary to making sure good governance and
accountability within the DTSP sector. The next enhancement is really helpful for
consideration:

Necessary
Coaching
: Annual coaching packages for CEOs and administrators on regulatory
compliance, danger administration, and rising developments in digital belongings.

Danger
Committee
: DTSPs above a sure measurement should set up a devoted
danger committee on the board degree.

Unbiased
Administrators
: Mandating a minimal variety of unbiased administrators based mostly on the
DTSP’s measurement and complexity.

Audit
Frequency
: Annual exterior audits for all DTSPs, with further quarterly
inner audits for bigger suppliers.

Regulators are more and more leveraging technological options to
improve their supervisory capabilities and handle huge quantities of information.
Consequently, companies should have interaction extra often with regulators concerning
fintech and regtech developments.

Fintech corporations that implement strong governance
constructions and conduct common audits are certainly much less prone to expertise
compliance breaches.

AML/CFT Measures

The measures proposed in elements 5–8 of the session
paper, significantly these associated to Anti-Cash Laundering (AML) and Countering
the Financing of Terrorism (CFT), are essential for sustaining the integrity of
Singapore’s monetary system. I suggest the next enhancements:

Danger-Based mostly
Strategy
: Implement a tiered KYC/AML method based mostly on transaction volumes and
danger profiles.

Expertise
Integration
: Encourage the usage of AI and machine studying for transaction
monitoring and suspicious exercise detection.

Regulatory
Expertise (RegTech) Sandbox
: Set up a sandbox surroundings for DTSPs to check
revolutionary compliance options.

For current prospects onboarded previous to licensing, I
recommend a phased method:

Part 1
(0–6 months)
: Danger evaluation of current buyer base

Part 2
(6–12 months)
: Enhanced due diligence for high-risk prospects

Part 3
(12–18 months)
: Full compliance with new necessities for all prospects

Correspondent Account Companies

The proposed necessities for Correspondent Account
Companies and knowledge sharing for regulation enforcement functions are important
parts of a complete regulatory framework. Maybe the next
would assist:

Standardized
Information Format
: Develop a standardized information format for data sharing throughout
the trade.

Blockchain
Analytics
: Encourage the usage of blockchain analytics instruments to reinforce
transaction traceability.

Safe
Data Sharing Platform
: Set up a safe, centralized platform for
data sharing between DTSPs and regulation enforcement companies.

Blockchain analytics instruments have been instrumental in
recovering stolen or illicitly obtained digital belongings worldwide. They permit regulation
enforcement companies to hint and determine suspicious cryptocurrency
transactions on the blockchain , resulting in asset restoration efforts.

Expertise Danger Administration

The draft notices FSM-N28 to FSM-N33 cowl important
points of DTSP operations, together with know-how danger administration, cyber
hygiene, and conduct. Based mostly on my observations, I suggest the next:

Steady
Monitoring
: Implement real-time monitoring methods for cyber threats and
operational dangers.

Incident
Response Drills
: Mandate common incident response drills and simulations.

Third-Occasion
Danger Administration
: Set up clear tips for managing dangers related to
third-party service suppliers.

Shopper
Schooling
: Require DTSPs to allocate assets for ongoing client training
initiatives.

Relating to working hours, maybe MAS can take into account a
versatile method that enables for twenty-four/7 operations whereas making certain enough danger
administration and buyer assist. This might contain:

Core
working hours (e.g., 9 AM to five PM SGT) with full assist providers

Prolonged
hours with automated methods and on-call assist

Scheduled
upkeep home windows throughout low-volume intervals

Timeline for Implementation:

To make sure a easy transition to the brand new regulatory
framework, I suggest the next timeline:

Month
0–3
: Publication of ultimate rules and tips

Month
3–6
: Business session and suggestions interval

Month
6–9
: Finalization of technical specs and reporting codecs

Month
9–12
: DTSP preparation and system upgrades

Month
12–18
: Phased implementation of latest necessities

Month
18–24
: Full compliance deadline for all DTSPs

This timeline permits for a gradual implementation,
giving DTSPs ample time to adapt their methods and processes whereas
making certain that the regulatory framework is absolutely operational inside two years.

With cautious implementation and steady refinement,
this regulatory framework has the potential to cement Singapore’s place as a
world chief in digital asset regulation, attracting revolutionary companies
whereas safeguarding the pursuits of shoppers and the broader monetary system.

Singapore has persistently positioned itself as a
forward-thinking jurisdiction, balancing innovation with strong regulatory
oversight. As a fellow Singaporean, I’m very happy with its future planning.

The Financial Authority of Singapore (MAS) is looking for submissions for the Session Paper on the proposed regulatory method for
Digital Token Service Suppliers (DTSPs) below the Monetary Companies and
Markets Act 2022.

As an alternative of replying to the submission immediately, I’ll
attempt to share my standpoint overtly right here, providing insights, potential plans,
and timelines for implementation. Earlier than I begin, I’m sharing this in my
private capability: I don’t signify any self-claimed digital belongings professional
teams, associations, or colleges.

License Software and Payment
Buildings

Within the first half of 2024, Singapore’s fintech market
noticed its cryptocurrency and blockchain sectors obtain US$211.90 million throughout
72 offers, marking a 22% enhance from US$166.30 million over 38 offers in
the second half of 2023.

Singapore has been actively engaged on strengthening
danger administration frameworks for digital asset tokenization and has lately
launched an initiative to increase asset tokenization inside monetary providers.

The proposed license utility processes and payment
constructions are essential components that may form the DTSP panorama in
Singapore. From my perspective, MAS ought to take into account implementing a tiered
method to each timelines and costs, reflecting the variety of DTSPs in phrases
of measurement, complexity, and danger profile.

For timelines, I suggest a three-tier system:

Quick-track
(60 days)
: For small, low-risk DTSPs with simple enterprise fashions.

Normal
(90 days)
: For medium-sized DTSPs or these with reasonably complicated operations.

Prolonged
(120+ days)
: For big, complicated DTSPs or these proposing novel enterprise fashions.

This tiered method would enable MAS to allocate
assets effectively whereas making certain thorough vetting of extra complicated
purposes. The payment constructions can comply with an analogous tiered system based mostly on
the DTSP’s annual income or transaction quantity could possibly be carried out.

Minimal Monetary Necessities

The proposed minimal monetary necessities are a
important safeguard in opposition to potential market disruptions and client losses.
Based mostly on my evaluation, I consider a risk-based method to setting these
necessities is extra possible. This might contain:

Base
Capital Requirement
: A minimal base capital for all DTSPs, no matter measurement
or providers provided.

Danger-Weighted
Capital Requirement
: Extra capital necessities based mostly on the DTSP’s kinds of providers provided, transaction volumes, and danger profile.

Liquidity
Requirement
: A minimal liquidity ratio to make sure DTSPs can meet short-term
obligations.

Particularly, suppliers with capital
ratios above 15% have been 30% much less prone to face operational disruptions throughout
intervals of utmost market stress. I suggest that MAS take into account setting the bottom
capital requirement at SGD 250,000, with further risk-weighted necessities
that would enhance this quantity as much as SGD 5 million for the most important and most
complicated DTSPs.

Audit
Necessities

The proposed duties of CEOs, administrators, and companions,
together with audit necessities, are elementary to making sure good governance and
accountability within the DTSP sector. The next enhancement is really helpful for
consideration:

Necessary
Coaching
: Annual coaching packages for CEOs and administrators on regulatory
compliance, danger administration, and rising developments in digital belongings.

Danger
Committee
: DTSPs above a sure measurement should set up a devoted
danger committee on the board degree.

Unbiased
Administrators
: Mandating a minimal variety of unbiased administrators based mostly on the
DTSP’s measurement and complexity.

Audit
Frequency
: Annual exterior audits for all DTSPs, with further quarterly
inner audits for bigger suppliers.

Regulators are more and more leveraging technological options to
improve their supervisory capabilities and handle huge quantities of information.
Consequently, companies should have interaction extra often with regulators concerning
fintech and regtech developments.

Fintech corporations that implement strong governance
constructions and conduct common audits are certainly much less prone to expertise
compliance breaches.

AML/CFT Measures

The measures proposed in elements 5–8 of the session
paper, significantly these associated to Anti-Cash Laundering (AML) and Countering
the Financing of Terrorism (CFT), are essential for sustaining the integrity of
Singapore’s monetary system. I suggest the next enhancements:

Danger-Based mostly
Strategy
: Implement a tiered KYC/AML method based mostly on transaction volumes and
danger profiles.

Expertise
Integration
: Encourage the usage of AI and machine studying for transaction
monitoring and suspicious exercise detection.

Regulatory
Expertise (RegTech) Sandbox
: Set up a sandbox surroundings for DTSPs to check
revolutionary compliance options.

For current prospects onboarded previous to licensing, I
recommend a phased method:

Part 1
(0–6 months)
: Danger evaluation of current buyer base

Part 2
(6–12 months)
: Enhanced due diligence for high-risk prospects

Part 3
(12–18 months)
: Full compliance with new necessities for all prospects

Correspondent Account Companies

The proposed necessities for Correspondent Account
Companies and knowledge sharing for regulation enforcement functions are important
parts of a complete regulatory framework. Maybe the next
would assist:

Standardized
Information Format
: Develop a standardized information format for data sharing throughout
the trade.

Blockchain
Analytics
: Encourage the usage of blockchain analytics instruments to reinforce
transaction traceability.

Safe
Data Sharing Platform
: Set up a safe, centralized platform for
data sharing between DTSPs and regulation enforcement companies.

Blockchain analytics instruments have been instrumental in
recovering stolen or illicitly obtained digital belongings worldwide. They permit regulation
enforcement companies to hint and determine suspicious cryptocurrency
transactions on the blockchain , resulting in asset restoration efforts.

Expertise Danger Administration

The draft notices FSM-N28 to FSM-N33 cowl important
points of DTSP operations, together with know-how danger administration, cyber
hygiene, and conduct. Based mostly on my observations, I suggest the next:

Steady
Monitoring
: Implement real-time monitoring methods for cyber threats and
operational dangers.

Incident
Response Drills
: Mandate common incident response drills and simulations.

Third-Occasion
Danger Administration
: Set up clear tips for managing dangers related to
third-party service suppliers.

Shopper
Schooling
: Require DTSPs to allocate assets for ongoing client training
initiatives.

Relating to working hours, maybe MAS can take into account a
versatile method that enables for twenty-four/7 operations whereas making certain enough danger
administration and buyer assist. This might contain:

Core
working hours (e.g., 9 AM to five PM SGT) with full assist providers

Prolonged
hours with automated methods and on-call assist

Scheduled
upkeep home windows throughout low-volume intervals

Timeline for Implementation:

To make sure a easy transition to the brand new regulatory
framework, I suggest the next timeline:

Month
0–3
: Publication of ultimate rules and tips

Month
3–6
: Business session and suggestions interval

Month
6–9
: Finalization of technical specs and reporting codecs

Month
9–12
: DTSP preparation and system upgrades

Month
12–18
: Phased implementation of latest necessities

Month
18–24
: Full compliance deadline for all DTSPs

This timeline permits for a gradual implementation,
giving DTSPs ample time to adapt their methods and processes whereas
making certain that the regulatory framework is absolutely operational inside two years.

With cautious implementation and steady refinement,
this regulatory framework has the potential to cement Singapore’s place as a
world chief in digital asset regulation, attracting revolutionary companies
whereas safeguarding the pursuits of shoppers and the broader monetary system.



RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments