Elon Musk’s X has launched its first transparency report since renaming from Twitter, which outlines all the reported rule violations, content material removing requests, and different enforcement actions that it actioned over the primary half of this 12 months.
And given X’s up to date strategy to content material moderation, many have been combing by way of the info making an attempt to see how Musk’s extra relaxed strategy to moderation has impacted the person expertise. However when it comes to complete actions, it’s really fairly related, at the least based mostly on the latest comparative updates from Twitter.
First off, X has offered an outline of the entire enforcement actions that it took based mostly on detected rule violations between January to June 2024.
As you possibly can see on this itemizing, hateful content material, abuse and harassment, and violent content material had been the principle causes for removals, as they’ve historically been in X/Twitter’s reviews.
In complete, X reviews that it suspended 5.2 million accounts within the first half of this 12 months based mostly on rule violations, and eliminated 10.7 million posts because of the identical.
Which is greater than what Twitter reported in its final printed transparency report, which coated the primary half of 2022.
Again then, Twitter’s crew (pre-Elon) enforced the removing of 6.6 million posts, and took motion towards 5 million accounts, although Twitter did word that it suspended solely 1.6 million accounts for violations, which is so much fewer than what X has undertaken just lately.
Within the first half of 2021, Twitter reported that it had eliminated 5.9 million tweets, and took motion towards 4.8 million accounts. It suspended 1.2 million of these profiles.
So on steadiness, X is eradicating much more content material, and suspending extra accounts, regardless of its new, extra open moderation insurance policies.
That’s probably reflective of a broader reliance on automation, as a result of fewer workers, which now sees X taking a extra binary view of violations. So accounts that may as soon as have been requested to take away content material are actually being suspended extra readily.
With that in thoughts, the accounts actioned and suspensions are literally very shut, with X eradicating virtually double as a lot content material as Twitter had been for violations.
Which might be not the end result that many anticipated.
Although the specifics listed below are extra in step with broader issues.
Based on X’s information, customers reported 81 million incidents of abuse and harassment within the interval, and 66 million circumstances of hate speech. Of these, 1.35% of the abusing accounts (per person reviews) had been suspended, and 0.004% of these posting hate speech had been eliminated. Hundreds of thousands of hate speech posts had been eliminated, however X is now far much less prone to droop customers for such.
In 2022, 111k profiles had been suspended for hateful conduct, versus 2.3k on this report.
By way of will increase, X suspended over 2 million extra accounts for youngster security than it did in 2022, and round 400k extra “misleading entities.”
It’s, nonetheless, taking much less motion towards suicide and self hurt content material (2k suspensions versus 11k in 2022).
By way of authorized requests, X obtained 72,000 authorized motion requests within the first half of the 12 months, and complied with 70% of them
In 2022, Twitter obtained 53,000 authorized requests, whereas it obtained 43,387 authorized calls for in 2021. It had beforehand complied with round 54% of those requests.
So, general, regardless of Elon Musk’s claims of a extra open and “free speech” aligned community, X is definitely eradicating extra content material, suspending extra customers, and actioning extra authorized requests than Twitter had been. But, its insurance policies now enable these selling hate speech to stay energetic, whereas self-harm content material can also be seemingly not being enforced as harshly.
None of that is overly shocking. X has clearly said that it’s now relying extra on attain restrictions than account suspensions and content material removals, whereas Elon himself has made an enormous present of opposing sure authorities orders, whereas complying with others.
The entire information right here aligns with this, however on the identical time, X is eradicating extra content material, and suspending extra accounts general, beneath this strategy.
Is that a greater scenario for the app? I imply, advertisers clearly don’t suppose so, however I might additionally query whether or not this can be a extra “free speech” pleasant strategy than what earlier Twitter administration had enforced.
It does appear that Twitter workers had really been much less prone to droop accounts general, based mostly on the numbers, which meant extra alternative for rectification, versus binary bans.
Or perhaps, X is simply attracting extra posts that invite suspension beneath X’s areas of focus.
It does look like a extra dangerous technique, general, however it’s attention-grabbing to notice the comparative variance in X’s moderation technique.
You may take a look at X’s newest transparency report right here.