Grammy-nominated songwriter Jon Hume has filed a lawsuit towards Common Music Group and Common Music Group Australia in a dispute over audio stems utilized in Dean Lewis’s hit, Be Alright.
The lawsuit was filed by Australia-born, however now Nashville-based Hume, in a Tennessee court docket on Wednesday (June 19).
Hume has labored with artists together with Dean Lewis (Be Alright, Half A Man and How Do I Say Goodbye), in addition to Sofi Tukker, Bebe Rexha, JP Cooper, NEEDTOBREATHE and Calum Scott.
Launched in 2018, Be Alright has been streamed over 1.7 billion instances on Spotify alone.
Hume says within the lawsuit that he and Lewis, a UMG/UMG Australia artist, composed Be Alright “on or about September 2015″.
He provides that, whereas they had been writing and recording the demo for the tune, Hume created numerous audio tracks i.e “stems” of him taking part in every instrument used within the demo.
Hume claims that he “additionally acted because the producer and, utilizing his musical stems, created the unique recording of Be Alright”.
The lawsuit claims additional: “Hume, solely, produced the Unique Recording and carried out and recorded each instrument, excluding Dean Lewis’ vocal, embodied on it.
“Every of these recordings of musical devices was recorded on a person stem, which, when mixed, composed everything of the sounds embodied on the Unique Recording, apart from the Dean Lewis vocal tracks.”
Hume claims in his lawsuit, which you’ll be able to learn in full right here, that later in 2016, then-UMG Australia MD Michael Taylor requested by way of e-mail in July 2016 “that Hume ship the Stems to a different producer”.
In that very same e-mail, addressed to Hume, and his spouse and supervisor Karen Hume, Taylor informed the Humes that “as a way to save time – and cash” the Stems recorded throughout the writing of Be Alright “had been for use as ‘reference’ solely and that “no utilization of the Stems from the demo [a reference to the Original Recording] would go into the Grasp.”
Hume alleges that Michael Taylor then emailed him the next month to ask if UMG may use the unique Stems “in the principle” and that the e-mail “closed with a ‘smiley face’ image”.
Based on the lawsuit, UMG Australia and Hume then mentioned giving Hume a producer credit score on Be Alright due the anticipated use of the audio stems. On Spotify, he’s presently credited as a songwriter on the monitor.
However Hume says within the criticism that on Could 1, 2018, former UMG Australia MD Michael Taylor, on behalf of the corporate “purposefully and deliberately suggested the Humes” that UMG Australia didn’t find yourself utilizing any of the Stems from the writing session with Dean Lewis within the remaining grasp recording in spite of everything.
The lawsuit then alleges that in December 2023, Dean Lewis supplied Jon Hume with the “total assortment of stems comprising the Launched Grasp [of Be Alright] as a reference for an additional tune for which Dean Lewis was searching for Jon Hume’s providers”.
He claims that when he obtained these stems he “found that, opposite to UMG’s representations, greater than fifty p.c (50%) of the Stems embodied within the Unique Recording had been additionally embodied within the Launched Grasp”.
“Opposite to UMG’s representations, greater than fifty p.c (50%) of the STEMS embodied within the Unique Recording had been additionally embodied within the Launched Grasp.”
Lawsuit filed by Jon Hume
Hume is suing UMG and UMG Australia for copyright infringement, alleging that they “misappropriated the sounds embodied on the Stems and that they “hid and misrepresented to [Hume] that they haven’t used the Stems”.
Hume’s criticism additionally says that UMG “has claimed and registered a Copyright within the sound recording of the Launched Grasp embodying [Hume’s] sounds” and that “the Defendants have straight infringed Plaintiff’s Copyright within the Stems”.
He seeks “statutory damages, compensatory damages, cheap attorneys’ charges, and prices from [UMG] for his or her direct infringements”.
He additionally seeks “an accounting of all ‘income’ as outlined in 17 U.SC. § 504, attributable to the infringements obtained” by UMG.
Moreover, Hume has requested that “within the different” to his copyright infringement declare, he desires the court docket to problem “a declaration” stating that “he’s a joint creator and certified copyright claimant of the Launched Grasp”.
He claims {that a} “substantial controversy” exists “between himself and the defendants “as as to whether [Hume] is an creator of the launched grasp” recording or not. The lawsuit continues: “Declaration by the Courtroom would terminate the controversy between Plaintiff and Defendants.”
Hume’s lawsuit additionally claims that he has a “proper to an accounting from Defendants of any and all income obtained as a direct or oblique results of Defendants’ exploitation of the Launched Grasp, and to cost of Plaintiffs’ share of such income”.
The criticism continues: “Defendants have an obligation to account for income obtained, derived, or ensuing from the exploitation of the Launched Grasp, together with, however not restricted to, another particular person or entity performing beneath a license, sublicense, lease and/or switch of rights beneath the Launched Grasp issued formally or informally by Defendants.”
Music Enterprise Worldwide
