One of many largest tales in girls’s basketball this previous 12 months was Caitlin Clark’s omission from the U.S. Olympic basketball workforce. Clark — amid an up-and-down starting to her rookie season on the Indiana Fever — was left off the 12-woman roster, a choice that immediately turned a nationwide controversy.
Critics railed USA Basketball for holding her off the workforce, citing her rising reputation as cause why she ought to have been on the Paris Olympics roster.
Moderately than Clark, the roster included guards with extra veteran guards like Jewell Loyd, Kelsey Plum, Jackie Younger, Chelsea Grey, Diana Taurasi, Sabrina Ionescu, and Kahleah Copper. Every of these guys had been multiple-time All-Stars — some even multiple-time Olympians. At 26 years previous, Ionescu marked the youngest participant on the roster.
In a Time interview with Sean Gregory, Clark admitted her preliminary disappointment from being left off the USA basketball roster — however made clear she rejected the notion she ought to have been named to the workforce as a result of her reputation.
When the rosters had been finalized, the Fever boasted a 3-9 file, and Clark was within the midst of an inconsistent begin to the season, a stretch that was marred by a number of high-turnover video games and spotty capturing performances.
“I gave them lots of causes to maintain me off the workforce with my play,” she mentioned.
She additionally acknowledged the depth of expertise on the USA Basketball roster.
“Some extent all people was making was like, ‘Who’re you taking off the workforce?’” Clark mentioned. “And that was an amazing level.”
Many media personalities insisted that leaving Clark off the roster was a mistake as a result of advertising and marketing cause — pointing to the visibility and a focus she would inveitably convey together with her to Paris.
ESPN’s Stephen A Smith and USA At present’s Christine Brennan had been two of the loudest voices that admonished USA Basketball for not placing Clark on the roster from a visibility standpoint — not as a result of the workforce was lacking her skillset.
Why leaving Caitlin Clark off the 2024 US Olympic girls’s basketball workforce issues, so much. I’ve reported on the workforce at each Olympics since 1984. I’ve watched the gorgeous lack of protection & lack of curiosity each time. Listed here are 4 sections of my Feb column on this precise subject: pic.twitter.com/MjwqeVQdR8
— Christine Brennan (@cbrennansports) June 8, 2024
“Now, you got here residence with the gold. You dealt with your small business,” mentioned Stephen A Smith of the USA Basketball girls’s workforce. “However whenever you discuss advertising and marketing the game, I feel Workforce USA missed a possibility to raise the profile of girls’s excellence within the sport of basketball.”
Clark rejected the notion that she ought to have been on the roster as a result of her particular person reputation.
“I don’t wish to be there as a result of I’m any person that may convey consideration,” Clark mentioned. “I really like that for the sport of girls’s basketball. However on the similar time, I wish to be there as a result of they suppose I’m ok. I don’t wish to be some little particular person that’s sort of dragged round for individuals to cheer about and solely watch as a result of I’m sitting on the bench.”
In actuality, Clark’s play in her rookie season finally demonstrated that she ought to have been on the workforce as a result of her basketball prowess. After the Olympic break, she tremendously improved her play, finally establishing herself as among the finest guards within the league, if not the greatest — and ultimately being named to the All-WNBA First Workforce.
Clark averaged 23.4 factors and eight.9 assists after the break, and the Fever punched their ticket to the WNBA playoffs for the primary time since 2017. She recorded extra assists in a single WNBA season than any participant in WNBA historical past.
Jen Rizzotti, USA Basketball’s choice committee chair, vehemently disagreed that gamers’ reputation ought to have been a consideration.
”It will be irresponsible for us to speak about her in a manner apart from how she would impression the play of the workforce,” Rizzotti mentioned. “As a result of it wasn’t the purview of our committee to determine how many individuals would watch or how many individuals would root for the U.S. It was our purview to create the very best workforce we may for Cheryl.”
Clark’s improved post-Olympic play demonstrated she nearly actually would have been an excellent match on the roster, particularly contemplating the struggles of among the USA workforce’s older gamers all through the event.
Clark famous that being left off the roster “will certainly encourage me my total profession.”
Barring an damage, the WNBA sensation is practicaly a shoe-in for the 2028 roster, one thing she advised Gregory was a “an enormous, large aim.”
However, the discourse round her exclusion by no means ought to have been centered round her reputation — or the possible viewership increase that might have come together with her inclusion.
“That entire narrative sort of upset me,” Clark mentioned. “As a result of that’s not honest. It’s disrespectful to the those that had been on the workforce, that had earned it and had been actually good. And it’s additionally disrespectful to myself.”