On the current WorldTour seminar in Good, biking’s greatest stakeholders sat by way of a presentation on the continued menace of technological fraud. At one level, the previous Homeland legal investigator Nick Raudenski turned to a display screen the place a fastidiously curated video depicted how the UCI is tackling the danger of hid motors in bikes.
UCI technicians have been proven inserting a digicam contained in the body of Jonas Vingegaard’s Cervélo on the Tour de France; Lotto Dstny’s Victor Campenaerts was proven watching an inspection of his personal bike; after which Raudenski delivered a line that was meant to remind these watching that although not one single rider has been discovered with a hidden motor of their bike at an expert race since 2016, the hazard stays as actual as ever.
“We’ve come throughout lots of allegations, lots of beliefs, lots of suspicions, and lots of suspicious performances,” stated Raudenski, who has headed up the UCI’s battle in opposition to technological fraud group since Could. “I don’t suppose something is unattainable. I believe we at all times need to be awake to what doubtlessly may occur.”
Raudenski’s speech, sources current on the seminar informed Cyclingnews, was met largely with a shrug of the shoulders. Whereas there’s widespread acceptance that motors have been current within the peloton within the early 2010s, there have been few rumours or allegations concerning the apply for the reason that Belgian cyclocross rider Femke van den Driessche was caught in 2016, and there’s subsequently deep scepticism that motor doping could also be occurring as we speak.
Signal as much as the Musette – our subscriber-only publication
However the UCI are insistent that they have to proceed to pour assets into combatting the potential for refined hidden expertise in bikes. As a result of in the event that they don’t, in keeping with the UCI’s president, David Lappartient, somebody will certainly cheat. “I consider that if we do nothing, it will occur,” the Frenchman informed the Ghost within the Machine podcast in the summertime.
“We will’t be an organisation that claims: ‘okay, this doesn’t exist and we gained’t spend lots of power on this’. I consider with new applied sciences, with engines changing into smaller and smaller [and] perhaps much less simple to detect, we’ve got to take a position extra within the expertise and likewise in investigations.
Staying one step forward
The UCI first developed a selected check for hid motors in early 2016: a magnetic scanner connected to an iPad. On its very first outing, it positioned the Vivax Help motor hidden in Van den Driessche’s spare cyclocross bike. Almost a decade on, the scanner stays the UCI’s most-used prevention methodology, with round 30-40 bikes examined day by day at WorldTour, World Championships and Olympic races.
Regardless of its speediness and omnipresence round group paddocks, the pill has repeatedly been accused of not having the ability to detect all varieties of motors, or distinguish between a hid motor designed to propel the drivetrain and a battery for digital shifting. Even Lappartient himself expressed issues concerning the magnetic scanner to the Ghost within the Machine podcast. “You’ll be able to cheat even with a pill,” he stated. “I don’t belief that the tablets are robust sufficient to battle in opposition to technological fraud. It’s higher than nothing, nevertheless it’s not constant sufficient.”
The UCI additionally has a €600,000 x-ray machine which usually exams round eight bikes per day on the greatest races, together with the stage winner and race chief, in addition to a €45,000 handheld backstatter gadget which might ship x-ray and density photos. If something that seems untoward is undiscovered, then the bike may be dismantled and inspected. The governing physique has beforehand trialled however dismissed thermal imaging cameras.
As a part of Raudenski’s remit, he has been tasked with researching new potential detection strategies to go alongside the present trio of programs. “We have now to remain upfront of how a lot is being developed, and so we’ve got to make it possible for we’re preserving tempo with that innovation,” the American added within the video proven on the seminar.
Cyclingnews understands that personal enterprises unaffiliated with the UCI are additionally engaged on new detection strategies, with the problem having made it to the eye of senior European politicians. Utilizing energy and cadence information to supply a ‘energy passport’ just like the Athlete Organic Passport has beforehand been mooted by some, in addition to embracing synthetic intelligence. “We have now to research through which approach AI will help us,” Lappartient stated in the summertime.
Electromagnetism and ‘particular wheels’
A motor inside an expert’s bike as we speak wouldn’t be something like these inside commercially accessible e-bikes: they’d be a lot smaller and nimble, able to producing between 20 and 50 watts, sufficient energy to supply a race-winning assault, however not so extravagant to instantly arouse suspicion.
The massive query everybody has is how even tiny motors and batteries might be hid inside a motorbike’s body, a rear hub or contained in the wheels and nonetheless evade detection, particularly an X-ray scan. Might they be camouflaged contained in the Shimano Di2 batteries, as an example? “For those who’re utilizing an excellent high quality battery that may attain 30 to 35 watts, you possibly can disguise it,” Stefano Varjas, essentially the most infamous and controversial producer of hid motors, informed Cyclingnews just lately. “However you possibly can’t disguise the engine: you want handbook contact on the drivetrain someplace.”
The Hungarian, who as soon as stated that he obtained $2m from an unnamed main Tour de France group in 1998 for unique rights to his motors, added that “with cash something is feasible – the one restrict is finances.” Although most have dismissed his boasts as fantasy and self-publication, Varjas has famously claimed to supply electromagnetic wheels that can not be detected with any scanner; he says the everlasting magnets hidden across the wheel are solely detectable when in use. “As soon as the wheel stops, there isn’t any proof,” he stated. “A hub system isn’t troublesome to detect, however an electromagnetic wheel is far more troublesome.” He has beforehand stated that such an innovation, if even attainable, is “thought of as an actual software for enhancing the facility of a racer.”
Whether or not or not ‘particular wheels’, as they’ve been dubbed, exist, there’s concern on the UCI that wi-fi groupsets are weak to being hacked, as was confirmed in the summertime. The worry is that if gears may be altered remotely, small motors may also be activated externally. This is able to tie into the varsity of thought some have that, as outlandish because it appears, a rider wouldn’t even have to know that their bike was mechanically assisted.
Motor doping’s underworld
A decade in the past, simply earlier than the e-bike market boomed right into a $50 billion enterprise, there have been a variety of hidden motor producers throughout Europe, every subtly squeezing motors and batteries into street bikes for higher-end shoppers with lots of disposable revenue.
As we speak, nonetheless, excluding Varjas and his E-powers model, those self same producers are not a part of {the electrical} bike enterprise – whether or not formally or informally. Vivax Help, the corporate that made the kind of motor that Van den Driessche had in her bike, closed down in 2020, and operations in Italy and Monaco have additionally closed. The fast enlargement of e-bikes has rendered their artful and costly work kind of redundant; wealthy clientele not have to fork out 1000’s on a modified bike with technological help once they may stroll to their native bike store and decide up a complicated and glossy design for a lot much less.
That’s to not say, although, that there’s nobody left on this area of interest house. “There are lots, not one, two or 5, extra like 20,” Varjas informed Cyclingnews when requested what number of opponents he has. “The world could be very large, and I believe there are lots of different producers,” he informed the Ghost within the Machine podcast earlier within the 12 months. “If they’ve their very own shoppers and in the event that they need to disguise, they don’t want promoting.”
The widespread notion amongst these within the know is that whereas Varjas was most likely on the reducing fringe of this innovation a number of a long time in the past, he not is. Figuring out those that could now be the kingpins of the hid motors enterprise is an enormous a part of Raudenski’s job. “I believe the expertise is on the market,” Raudenski stated. “I believe it exists, and I believe if there’s sufficient cash to throw at an issue or at a state of affairs then there’s sufficient cash to offer an answer that may seemingly not be really easy to detect.”
Is the UCI chasing a crimson herring?
Snooping out the cheaters and the individuals behind them could be very gradual and drawn-out. It’s the identical as attempting to uncover proof of doping or a sportsperson match-fixing: they’re usually a number of steps forward of comparatively underfunded governing our bodies and establishments working to catch them.
It’s fully believable – and most within the sport suppose that is the case – that Raudenski and the UCI are chasing a crimson herring; the motor menace, largely due to the trio of prevention strategies in place that act as a deterrent, has ceased to exist. However so grave is the potential for somebody committing technological fraud – Lappartient has stated it will “destroy the game” – that the UCI insists that most surveillance is required, therefore the appointment of Raudenski.
“It’s why somebody of my profile was introduced in, that concentrate on intelligence and investigations,” Raudenski stated, a nod to the rewards scheme the UCI launched in September, designed to incentivise individuals with essential info to return ahead. “Creating sources, discovering new analytic means… working with individuals within the area, and likewise conducting these investigations robustly and swiftly. We’re not going to be testing everyone, however be far more centered and [test] based mostly on particular info.”
That final line is essential. In 2023, an investigation by the RadioCycling podcast discovered that no bikes have been examined for technological fraud in two of the three Giro d’Italia time trials, whereas neither the magnetic scanners nor X-ray machines have been in use at a number of WorldTour races. Figures markedly improved in 2024, however the UCI admits that there are nonetheless flaws in its system, and fears that riders’ bikes can nonetheless keep away from detection.
“I need to ensure that the bike that can be examined on the finish is the bike that has been used,” Lappartient stated. “And it appears to be that the method just isn’t 100% fully safe. When any individual needs to cheat they may at all times attempt to discover the small particulars [like] the place they’ll do that.”
Bike adjustments, which have turn into more and more extra frequent for the reason that common adoption of disc brakes made wheel adjustments slower and extra difficult, are highlighted by Lappartient. “I noticed some movies on social media and typically you don’t know why at 10k to go they modify their bike,” he stated. “Perhaps there are some actual causes, however how can we ensure that they [UCI officials] will test the bike on the roof of the automobile and they won’t change it or take away the bike? Along with this, how can we be sure that some bikes and gear that weren’t checked earlier than [the race] can’t be used? All these sorts of issues need to be safe, very high-level processes, and on the date of as we speak I don’t consider it’s fully 100% safe.”
Raudenski sides along with his boss in relation to sustaining a stance of perpetual vigilance. “If persons are loopy sufficient to attempt it, and if we’re not there watching, not attempting to discourage and detect, then they’ll attempt it, after which the game turns into a farce and also you watch them driving up with motorbikes,” he stated. “There are two elements: the deterrent facet and the enforcement facet when it occurs.”
Because the tenth anniversary of Van den Driessche’s sanction approaches, success for the UCI as we speak is deterring would-be motor dopers and strengthening what they admit is at present a fallible prevention system, moderately than solely busting the cheats. “What we need to do is to not discover some cheater however to make sure that no person will cheat,” Lappartient stated. Van den Driessche would possibly very presumably stay the one ever convicted motor doper.
For those who subscribe to Cyclingnews, it’s best to join our new subscriber-only publication. From unique interviews and tech galleries to race evaluation and in-depth options, the Musette means you may by no means miss out on member-exclusive content material. Join now
