In March 2003, the German Overseas Workplace established a web based platform, named Qantara, which suggests “bridge” in classical Arabic, in response to the 9/11 assaults in america and the hostility they triggered within the West towards Muslims. The declared purpose of the impartial portal, run by German public broadcaster Deutsche Welle, was to “bridge” cultural variations between the West and the Islamic world and supply a impartial platform for interreligious dialogue.
The portal, which publishes content material in English, German and Arabic, operated efficiently for greater than 20 years, seemingly with no editorial steerage from the German authorities. This modified, nevertheless, when it started publishing content material important of German debates on anti-Semitism within the context of the Gaza genocide. Earlier this yr, it was introduced that Qantara can be restructured, and its administration can be transferred from Deutsche Welle to the Institute for Overseas Cultural Relations (Institut für Auslandsbeziehungen – IFA), which is affiliated to and funded by the Federal Overseas Workplace.
The ministry claimed the transfer was “purely” structural and unrelated to the editorial route and output of the positioning. German Overseas Minister Annalena Baerbock, nevertheless, contradicted this declare, suggesting in an interview that considerations about content material revealed by Qantara, significantly content material on anti-Semitism, have been an element within the determination.
Following the announcement, 35 members of Qantara’s editorial workers revealed an open letter addressed to Baerbock, expressing doubt that the IFA possessed the editorial capacities wanted for the profitable continuation of this complicated venture, which had been painstakingly constructed over a few years and has proved to be an important supply for these within the Center East and Europe’s relationship with it. The letter had no impact, and all editorial workers resigned in protest.
On July 1, the administration of Qantara, which not had any editorial workers members, was transferred from Deutsche Welle to IFA. IFA mentioned the portal will stay below its editorial management till the brand new editor-in-chief, Jannis Hagmann, kinds a brand new editorial board and formally begins work someday within the coming weeks.
This transitional interval at Qantara represents a singular alternative to look at and assess the true views of the German authorities concerning the Center East and its peoples, on condition that state officers are actually brazenly enhancing a platform marketed as Germany’s “bridge” to the Islamic world.
Earlier than the change in administration, Qantara was revered for its goal, informative, in-depth reporting and evaluation on the Center East and the broader Islamic world, each in Germany and the area itself.
That is not the case. Proper now, below the editorial route of the Overseas Workplace-affiliated IFA, Qantara seems centered not on initiating intercultural and interreligious dialogue and dialogue, however on confirming the German authorities’s biases and prejudices about Muslims, particularly Palestinians, via poorly researched and edited opinion articles.
Maybe one of the best instance of Qantara’s new editorial stance – and by extension the German authorities’s true views on the Center East and its peoples – is an opinion piece, titled “Disaster Communication and the Center East: Like and Share”, revealed on July 25.
The op-ed, supposedly analysing the media protection of Israel’s conflict on Gaza, by Moroccan-German writer Sineb El Masrar, frames Palestinians as an inherently violent and anti-Semitic people who find themselves mendacity about their struggling, their historical past, their tradition and their political motivations to malign Israel and destabilise Western democracies.
It authoritatively states, with out proof or something that resembles a supporting argument, that Palestinian journalists reporting on genocide are Hamas operatives in disguise, that pictures of demise and affected by Gaza are “staged”, that Palestinians hate Zionist occupiers on their land solely due to “Islamic anti-Semitism”, that there’s really no famine in Gaza and the worldwide media are deliberately not publishing photographs of “full market stalls and barbecue stations” within the Strip.
The writer claims, for instance, famine within the Gaza Strip, “in accordance with the lately revealed Built-in Meals Safety Part Classification (IPC) Report, didn’t and doesn’t exist.” In fact, the report linked within the article clearly states: “Whereas the entire territory [of the Gaza Strip] is assessed in Emergency (IPC Part 4), over 495,000 folks (22 p.c of the inhabitants) are nonetheless dealing with catastrophic ranges of acute meals insecurity (IPC Part 5).” The IPC defines Part 5 in its reality sheet as “famine” and says this rating is barely attributed to an space when it “has at the least 20 p.c of households dealing with an excessive lack of meals, at the least 30 p.c of kids affected by acute malnutrition, and two folks for each 10,000 dying every day resulting from outright hunger or to the interplay of malnutrition and illness”.
It appears, in accordance with Qantara and the federal government officers at the moment controlling it, even famine as confirmed by the IPC just isn’t actually famine when it’s taking place to Palestinians and is facilitated by Israel.
The blatant distortions of reality within the article don’t finish there. The writer additionally argues that “Islamic anti-Semitism” was the explanation why Muslims in Palestine resisted the Zionist takeover of their lands. She provides, “Not like Germany, the Center East itself has by no means come to phrases with its Nazi previous.”
That is, clearly, an Orwellian lie that has no place being repeated in any severe journalistic publication. What means that the Center East really has a “Nazi previous” that it wants to come back to phrases with? In fact, nothing. Nazism is an solely Western – and particularly German – ideology with no foundation in or connection to the Center East and Muslim populations residing there.
Muslims within the area are prejudiced towards not Jews and Judaism – which was itself born and codified within the Center East and prospered below Muslim rule in varied nations throughout the area for hundreds of years – however the Zionists ruling Israel, who’ve been killing their family members, stealing their land and confining them in closely policed ghettos for many years.
“The Palestinian difficulty has been instrumentalised to destabilise Western democracies,” the article additional says.
It appears the writer, very similar to the German authorities, is aggravated that individuals internationally, together with in Germany, are objecting to Israel’s try at exterminating a whole folks.
So is it actually the instrumentalisation of the “Palestinian difficulty”, no matter meaning, that’s destabilising Western democracies? Or might it’s that facilitating and defending the genocide of the Palestinians is what destabilises them? In spite of everything, killing innocents en masse – or offering monetary, authorized and diplomatic cowl for the carnage – just isn’t consistent with self-declared values of Western democracies, corresponding to respect for human rights and worldwide legislation. That is maybe why the article tries to argue the devastation we’re all watching in actual time in Gaza is in some way “staged” – the German authorities wants it to be staged to maintain telling the those that it has the ethical excessive floor.
With this one article, revealed below the editorial management of a Overseas Workplace-affiliated institute, the German authorities burned its “bridge” to the Islamic world. That the article continues to be up on Qantara, with none correction or clarification – even to appropriate probably the most blatant “no famine” lie – after important backlash from its supposed audience, suggests Germany has misplaced all curiosity in initiating dialogue with the Islamic world. It needs the platform to principally abandon all journalistic integrity, and publish content material that helps – at any price – the federal government’s overseas coverage.
Why is that this?
It appears for the reason that starting of Israel’s genocide in Gaza 10 months in the past, the opinions, ideas and aspirations of the Muslim world, and the broader International South, don’t matter to the German authorities. It’s not concerned with any dialogue or dialogue, it solely needs to proceed with its present overseas coverage in the direction of the area, which cares about one factor and one factor alone: cleaning itself of the burden of the Holocaust within the eyes of fellow Western nations via defending Israel unconditionally and framing these resisting Israeli abuse as modern-day Nazis. Thus, it labels Palestinians, and by extension all Muslims defending them, as “Nazis”.
Qantara’s incoming editor, Jannis Hagmann, mentioned in a latest interview that he and his crew, as soon as they formally begin work, is not going to enable themselves to be “interfered with by way of content material, neither by the IFA nor by the Overseas Workplace”.
He mentioned he was “aggravated” by El Masrar’s providing and that “the article wouldn’t have appeared on this kind below the brand new Qantara crew”.
Maybe he can be confirmed proper, and as soon as the brand new crew takes management, we’ll see a return to outdated Qantara, the place articles like El Masrar’s wouldn’t discover themselves a spot on the homepage. But, as soon as a bridge is burned, it takes time and important effort to rebuild it. The platform is now dealing with an uphill battle to show it’s greater than a authorities propaganda outlet.
Regardless of the future brings, nevertheless, this transitional interval in Qantara, and El Masrar’s article, already taught us loads concerning the German authorities and its method to the Center East. They confirmed us that the German authorities sees Israel as a righteous and ethical entity even when it commits genocide, and the Muslims as anti-Semitic, easy however manipulative hordes hell-bent on destabilising Western democracies.
And this, nevertheless upsetting, is certainly precious data if we’re to know and counter the German response to Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza.
The views expressed on this article are the writer’s personal and don’t essentially mirror Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.
